Credit Management Performance in Global IME Bank – Community Presentation

Creator prompt

The idea behind this presentation

CREDIT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL IME BANK Title A Project Work Report By Abhishek Jarga Magar Exam Roll No:704460001 T.U Reg. No: 7-2-39-417-2021 Kathmandu Model College Submitted to Faculty of Management Tribhuvan University Kathmandu In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS) Bagbazar,Kathmandu July 2026 ii Declaration I hereby declare that the project work entitled CREDIT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL IME BANK submitted to faculty of management, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu is an original piece of work under the supervision of Ujwol Bhattarai faculty member of Kathmandu Model College, Bagbazar and is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS). This project work report has not been submitted to any other university or institution for award of any degree or diploma. …………………………. Abhishek Jarga Magar Date: ………………………….. iii Supervisor’s Recommendation The project work entitled CREDIT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL IME BANK submitted by Abhishek Jarga Magar under my supervision as per the procedure and format requirement laid by faculty of management. Tribhuvan University, as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the degree of Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS). I therefore recommend the project work for evaluation. …………………………… Ujwol Bhattarai Supervisor Date: …………………….. iv Endorsement We hereby endorse the project work report entitled CREDIT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL IME BANK submitted by Abhishek Jarga Magar of Kathmandu Model College, Bagbazar the partial fulfillment of requirement of award of Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS) for external evaluation. ……………………….. Name Chairman, Research Committee Date: ……………………… ……………………….. Surendra Subedi Campus Chief Date: ……………………… v Acknowledgement I am very pleased to present myself as an author of report entitled CREDIT MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE IN GLOBAL IME BANK has been prepared for the partial fulfillment of the degree of Bachelor of Business Studies (BBS). I wish to express my deep gratitude and sincere thanks to my report supervisor Ujwol Bhattarai , Lecturer of Kathmandu Model College, Bagbazar for suggesting of this research paper and for his constant encouragement, patient guidance, valuable supervision and meticulous care from time to time discuss on several aspect of this research study. I am also grateful to Campus Chief Surendra Subedi, Chairman of research committee N/A, and all others faculty member of Kathmandu Model College, Bagbazar for their kind cooperation during the study period. I can’t stand without thanking to my family members who has been providing continuous support to manage my life. In fact, I would not be able to fulfill this dream without their constant encouragement and support. The help of my friends is also unforgettable to me. I thank all of them. Submitted by Abhishek Jarga Magar BBS 4 th Year (Finance Group) Kathmandu Model College, Bagbazar vi Table of Contents Title ...................................................................................................................................... i Declaration ......................................................................................................................... ii Supervisor’s Recommendation...........................................................................................iii Endorsement ...................................................................................................................... iv Acknowledgement ................................................................................................................v Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... vi List of Tables..................................................................................................................... vii List of Figure.................................................................................................................... viii List of Abbreviations.......................................................................................................... ix CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background of the Study........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Profile of the Organization........................................................................................ 3 1.3 Objectives of the Study ............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Rationale of the Study............................................................................................... 4 1.5 Literature Review...................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Research Methodology.............................................................................................. 9 1.7 Limitations of the Study.......................................................................................... 10 CHAPTER II RESULTS AND FINDINGS..................................................................11 2.1 Data Presentation......................................................................................................11 2.2 Analysis of Results.................................................................................................. 20 2.3 Finding .................................................................................................................... 21 CHAPTER III SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION..................................................... 23 3.1 Summary ................................................................................................................. 23 3.2 Conclusion............................................................................................................... 24 BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................................................................................... 25 APPENDICES................................................................................................................. 28 vii List of Tables Table No. Title Page No. 1 Non Performing Loan Ratio 11 2 Capital Adequacy Ratio 13 3 Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio 15 4 Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio 16 5 Return on Assets Ratio 18 6 Return on Equity Ratio 19 viii List of Figures Figure No. Title Page No. 1 Trend Line of Non Performing Loan Ratio 12 2 Trend Line of Capital Adequacy Ratio 14 3 Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio 15 4 Trend Line of Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio 17 5 Trend Line of Return on Assets 18 6 Trend Line of Return on Equity 20 ix List of Abbreviations BBS : Bachelor in Business Studies CAR : Capital Adequacy Ratio CRM : Customer Relationship Management GBIME : Global IME Bank Limited GDP : Gross Domestic Product IT : Information Technology LDR : Loans to Deposit Ratio NPL : Non Performing Loan NPLs : Non-Performing Loans NRB : Nepal Rastra Bank 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study Credit management is a key process for financial institutions, especially commercial banks, to handle the lending of money effectively. It involves setting clear policies for granting credit, monitoring loans, and collecting repayments (Smith, 2018). The main goal is to reduce the risk of borrowers not paying back their loans, known as default risk. Proper credit management ensures that banks lend money wisely, protecting their assets and maintaining profitability. This practice is fundamental to the stability and growth of any banking system worldwide. Without strong credit management, banks face significant financial challenges, impacting their ability to support economic activities. It is a core function that directly influences a bank's success and its contribution to the economy. Globally, effective credit management is vital for the health and stability of the banking sector. Commercial banks, as primary lenders, rely on sound credit practices to manage their loan portfolios and ensure sustainable operations (Johnson, 2019). It helps banks avoid large losses from bad loans, which can threaten their existence and cause wider financial crises. By carefully assessing borrowers' ability to repay, banks can allocate capital efficiently, supporting businesses and individuals. This process directly contributes to economic growth by funding investments and consumption. Therefore, strong credit management is not just about a bank's profit; it is about maintaining trust in the financial system and supporting overall economic development. The global landscape of credit management is constantly changing, driven by technological advancements and evolving economic conditions. Banks worldwide are increasingly adopting advanced data analytics and artificial intelligence to improve credit scoring and risk assessment (Miller, 2020). However, they also face significant challenges, such as managing credit risk in volatile markets and adapting to stricter regulatory requirements. The rise of digital lending platforms and fintech companies also creates new competition, pushing traditional commercial banks to innovate their credit 2 processes. Ensuring data security and privacy while leveraging new technologies remains a critical concern. These global trends highlight the continuous need for banks to refine their credit management strategies to remain competitive and secure. In Nepal, the commercial banking sector plays a central role in the nation's economy, facilitating financial transactions and providing essential credit facilities. These banks operate under the strict supervision of Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB), which sets policies and guidelines for financial stability and sound banking practices (Acharya, 2017). Credit management is particularly crucial for Nepali commercial banks, as a significant portion of their assets comprises loans and advances. The ability of these banks to effectively manage credit directly impacts their profitability and overall financial health. Understanding the unique operational and regulatory environment in Nepal is essential for evaluating credit management practices within its commercial banking system. Despite the growth of the banking sector in Nepal, commercial banks frequently encounter challenges in credit management. Issues such as rising non-performing loans (NPLs) remain a significant concern, impacting banks' asset quality and profitability (Shrestha, 2021). Effective credit risk assessment is often complicated by limited access to reliable borrower data and the informal nature of some economic activities. Furthermore, the loan recovery process can be lengthy and complex due to legal frameworks and socio-economic factors. These problems highlight the need for Nepali commercial banks to continuously improve their credit management strategies to mitigate risks and ensure sustainable financial performance, contributing to the broader economic stability. Given the persistent challenges in credit management faced by commercial banks in Nepal, there is a clear need for focused academic research in this area. Understanding the specific factors influencing credit risk and the effectiveness of current management practices is crucial for enhancing bank performance (Rai, 2022). This study aims to explore the various aspects of credit management within Nepali commercial banks, identifying areas for improvement and potential best practices. Such research can provide valuable insights for bank management, policymakers, and regulators to develop more robust credit policies and strategies. Ultimately, this will contribute to a more resilient 3 and efficient banking sector, supporting Nepal's economic development. 1.2 Profile of the Organization Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) began its journey in 2007 as a Class “A” commercial bank, receiving approval from Nepal Rastra Bank (NRB). In 2012, it merged with IME Financial Institution Ltd. and Lord Buddha Finance Ltd., rebranding as Global IME Bank Ltd. Over the years, GIBL further strengthened its presence by merging with Commerz and Trust Bank Nepal Ltd., Janata Bank Nepal Ltd., and Bank of Kathmandu, making it one of the largest banks in Nepal. These strategic mergers have provided a solid foundation, expanded operational scale, and reinforced the bank’s commitment to excellence and customer-centric banking. GIBL aspires to be “The Bank for All”, offering world-class banking services to fuel Nepal’s economy. Since its establishment, the bank has grown its capital base to NPR 38.1158 billion, which is publicly traded on the Nepal Stock Exchange (NEPSE), reflecting financial stability and stakeholder confidence. Serving over 5 million customers, GIBL has created a robust domestic network covering all 77 districts, with 352 branches, 385 ATMs, 150 branchless banking units (BLBs), and 68 extension counters, providing both digital and physical banking services. Digital channels now account for 73% of total transactions, supporting more than 2 million mobile and internet banking users and 1 million debit card holders. The bank offers comprehensive financial solutions, including loans to over 81,000 customers and a strong remittance inflow of 21.1%, reflecting its leadership in the domestic and international financial markets. GIBL emphasizes innovation, technologydriven banking, and customer-focused quality products to enhance growth, profitability, and stakeholder value. The mission of the bank is to expand market share through innovative solutions, maintain operational efficiency, and deliver the optimum benefit to all stakeholders. Its vision aligns with its mission, aiming to provide the highest standards of banking services for clients across regions and social strata, ensuring inclusive and sustainable financial growth. GIBL has also established a strong international presence, with representative offices in London (UK), Delhi (India), and Sydney (Australia), and Relationship Officers (ROs) 4 deployed in 10 countries to promote remittances and banking services. The bank maintains borrowings from international financial institutions such as British International Investment (formerly CDC), IFC, and KfW Development Bank, supporting SMEs, MSMEs, and sustainable development projects in Nepal. This global outreach and financial support reinforce GIBL’s position as a trusted and forward-looking institution, committed to delivering innovative, ethical, and accessible banking solutions both domestically and internationally. 1.3 Objectives of the Study The objectives of the study is to find out the Credit Management Performance in Global IME Bank in the five fiscal year period from 2077/78 BS to 2081/82 BS. The objectives of the study are as follows:  To analyze the Non Performing Loan of the Global IME Bank.  To analyze the Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loans to Deposit Ratio of the Global IME Bank. 1.4 Rationale of the Study Credit management is a key part of how commercial banks operate. It involves how banks lend money and make sure loans are repaid. When loans are not repaid, they become Non Performing Loans (NPLs). High NPLs can harm a bank's financial health and reduce its profits. Commercial banks in Nepal, like those in many developing countries, face challenges with managing credit risk and controlling NPLs. Two important measures of a bank's health are its Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and its Loans to Deposit Ratio (LDR). CAR shows if a bank has enough capital to cover potential losses. LDR indicates how much of a bank's deposits are given out as loans. Understanding how these ratios affect NPLs is crucial for keeping banks stable and strong. This study aims to explore these relationships within the Nepalese banking sector. This study offers valuable insights for several groups involved with commercial banks. Banks themselves can use the findings to improve their credit policies and lending practices. This can help them reduce NPLs and manage risks more effectively. Bank managers will gain a clearer understanding of how their decisions on capital and lending 5 affect loan quality. This knowledge can guide them in making better choices for the bank's financial future. Policymakers and regulators can use the results to develop stronger rules and guidelines for the banking sector. This helps ensure the overall stability of the financial system in Nepal. Shareholders and investors will also benefit. They can make more informed decisions about where to put their money by understanding the factors that influence a bank's performance and risk levels. The study's implications will help foster a more robust and reliable banking environment for everyone. This research adds to the academic literature on credit management in emerging economies, especially in Nepal. It provides specific evidence on how Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loans to Deposit Ratio relate to Non Performing Loans in this context. The study helps fill a gap in current knowledge by focusing on the unique aspects of the Nepalese banking sector. Its findings can serve as a basis for future research. Scholars can use this work to explore other factors influencing bank stability or to compare these relationships in different countries. 1.5 Literature Review A literature review is a simple summary of studies and books related to a topic. It explains what other people have already written or researched.This helps students understand the topic better. It also helps in planning and improving their own study. 1.5.1 Conceptual Review Credit management is a crucial process for commercial banks, involving the systematic control and monitoring of credit facilities extended to borrowers. It aims to minimize credit risk, ensure asset quality, and maintain financial stability within the institution. Effective credit management practices are essential for a bank's profitability and longterm sustainability (Sharma, 2018). This process includes evaluating borrower creditworthiness and managing loan portfolios. A Non Performing Loan (NPL) refers to a loan where the borrower has failed to make scheduled payments for a specified period, typically 90 days. These loans are considered at high risk of not being repaid, negatively impacting a bank's profitability and asset quality (Khanal, 2019). High levels of NPLs can signal financial distress. 6 The Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) measures a bank's capital in relation to its riskweighted assets. It indicates a bank's ability to absorb potential losses and protects depositors and the financial system (Gurung, 2020). Regulators set minimum CAR requirements to ensure financial stability. The Loans to Deposit Ratio (LDR) compares a bank's total loans to its total deposits. This ratio shows how much of a bank's deposits are being used to fund loans, reflecting its liquidity and lending strategy (Thapa, 2021). A higher LDR can indicate lower liquidity but potentially higher profitability. Several theories explain the dynamics of credit management and its impact on bank performance. Agency theory suggests that information asymmetry between lenders and borrowers can lead to adverse selection and moral hazard, increasing credit risk (Rai, 2017). Furthermore, the capital structure theory implies that a bank's capital level influences its risk-taking behavior and ability to absorb losses, directly affecting loan quality. These theories provide a framework for understanding how capital and lending practices relate to loan performance. The relationship between Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Loans to Deposit Ratio (LDR), and Non Performing Loan (NPL) is complex. A higher CAR generally indicates a stronger financial buffer, which might lead banks to adopt more prudent lending practices, thus potentially reducing NPLs. Conversely, a very high LDR suggests aggressive lending, which, if not accompanied by robust credit assessment, could increase the likelihood of NPLs. Banks must balance lending growth with maintaining asset quality and sufficient capital to manage credit risk effectively. 1.5.2 Review of Previous Studies Sharma, R. (2015) conducted a study titled 'An Analysis of Credit Portfolio Management at Nepal Bank Limited'. The main objective was to analyze how Nepal Bank Limited manages its loan portfolio. The study found that the bank's credit policies helped reduce loan defaults. It also showed that diversifying loans across different sectors was beneficial. The conclusion was that strong portfolio management practices improved the bank's overall stability. 7 Karki, S. (2016) investigated the 'Impact of Credit Risk Assessment on Profitability of Everest Bank Limited'. This research aimed to understand how credit risk assessment affects the profits of Everest Bank Limited. The findings indicated that careful assessment of borrowers before giving loans led to lower non-performing loans (NPLs). This directly boosted the bank's profitability. The study concluded that effective credit risk assessment is crucial for maintaining a healthy profit margin. Thapa, P. (2017) carried out research on 'Credit Sanctioning Process and its Effectiveness at Global IME Bank Limited'. The objective was to evaluate the process of approving loans and its effectiveness at Global IME Bank Limited. The study revealed that a streamlined and transparent loan approval process reduced delays. It also improved customer satisfaction and minimized risks. The conclusion was that a well-defined credit sanctioning process is vital for operational efficiency and risk control. Gurung, D. (2018) authored a study titled 'Managing Non-Performing Loans: A Case Study of Standard Chartered Bank Limited'. The purpose was to examine the strategies used by Standard Chartered Bank Limited to manage non-performing loans (NPLs). The study identified that early identification of problematic loans and proactive recovery efforts were key. These methods helped the bank reduce its NPL ratio significantly. The research concluded that robust NPL management strategies are essential for a bank's financial health. Rai, A. (2019) explored 'The Role of Credit Policy in Mitigating Risk at Prime Commercial Bank Limited'. This study aimed to understand the role of credit policies in reducing risks at Prime Commercial Bank Limited. The research showed that clear and strict credit policies helped prevent bad loans. Regular review and updates of these policies were also important. The conclusion was that comprehensive credit policies are fundamental for effective risk mitigation in banking. Limbu, B. (2020) conducted a study on 'Customer Relationship Management in Credit Services at Citizens Bank International Limited'. The objective was to assess how customer relationship management (CRM) impacts credit services at Citizens Bank International Limited. The study found that strong customer relationships led to better repayment behavior. Personalized credit advice also improved customer loyalty. The 8 implication was that integrating CRM into credit services can enhance both risk management and customer satisfaction. Yadav, M. (2021) analyzed 'Digitalization of Credit Processes at Siddhartha Bank Limited and its Efficiency'. The purpose was to understand the impact of digitalizing credit processes on efficiency at Siddhartha Bank Limited. The research indicated that digital platforms for loan applications and approvals sped up the process. This also reduced human errors and operational costs. The study concluded that digitalization significantly improves the efficiency and accuracy of credit management. Shrestha, N. (2022) identified 'Credit Risk Mitigation Techniques Adopted by Kumari Bank Limited'. The objective was to find and evaluate the techniques Kumari Bank Limited uses to reduce credit risk. The study highlighted the use of collateral, guarantees, and credit insurance as effective tools. These techniques helped protect the bank from potential losses. The conclusion was that a combination of various mitigation techniques strengthens a bank's credit risk framework. Chen, L. (2022) investigated 'The Influence of Macroeconomic Factors on Bank Credit Risk in Emerging Economies'. This study aimed to understand how large-scale economic factors affect bank credit risk in developing countries. The study revealed that inflation and interest rate changes significantly impacted loan defaults. Economic growth, however, tended to reduce credit risk. The conclusion was that banks in emerging economies must consider macroeconomic trends when managing their credit portfolios. Adhikari, K. (2023) examined 'Sustainable Lending Practices and Credit Performance at NMB Bank Limited'. The objective was to explore the relationship between sustainable lending practices and credit performance at NMB Bank Limited. The research showed that lending to environmentally and socially responsible projects led to lower default rates. It also improved the bank's public image. The study concluded that sustainable lending can contribute to both financial stability and positive social impact. Miller, J. (2023) explored 'Behavioral Aspects of Loan Repayment and Credit Scoring Models'. The study aimed to understand how borrower behavior influences loan repayment and how this can be integrated into credit scoring. The study found that psychological factors, such as financial literacy and past payment habits, were strong 9 predictors of repayment. Incorporating these into scoring models improved accuracy. The conclusion was that understanding behavioral aspects can enhance the effectiveness of credit risk assessment tools. Subedi, G. (2024) assessed 'Technological Innovations in Credit Delivery at Himalayan Bank Limited'. The objective was to evaluate the role of new technologies in improving credit delivery services at Himalayan Bank Limited. The study indicated that mobile banking and online platforms made loan applications faster and more accessible. This expanded the bank's reach to a wider customer base. The conclusion was that embracing technological innovations is key to modernizing credit services and improving customer experience. 1.6 Research Methodology In order to achieve the objective mentioned above following research methodology has been followed. In this study the procedure concerning the research includes research design, nature and source of data and collection procedure, tools used for analysis. 1.6.1 Research Design This research has followed the descriptive research design. Research design that is developed with the aim of studying the subject of details and explain the facts and characteristics related to research problem is known as descriptive design. The main goal of this report is to describe the data and characteristics about what is being studied. 1.6.2 Population and Sample The population refers to the industries of the same nature and its services and product in general. Population is the entire collection of interest i.e people, objects or events as defines by the researcher and sample is the entire collection of all observations of the interest for the researcher. Currently, there are 20 commercial bank in Nepal. Out of total 20 commercial bank of Nepal, Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) is taken as sample for this report. 10 1.6.3 Data Collection Procedure While preparing this report data has been collected from secondary sources. Secondary data refers to data that was collected by someone other than the user. It is originally collected from different sources. So, in the course of preparing this report the necessary data and documents are collected only from secondary sources. A. Secondary Data Secondary data is defined as data collected earlier for a purpose other than the one currently being pursued. Secondary sources refer to those for already gathered by others. They are referred to as coming from secondary sources such include  Annual report  Books  Related articles  Journals 1.6.4 Analysis of Data In this report, the researchers have used the following presentation and analysis tools:  Tables  Percentage  Statistical tools  Financial tools 1.7 Limitations of the Study As every research has its own limitation. This study is also not free from it. The limitations of the research are as follows:  The study has covered the data and information only for five fiscal year period from 2077/78 BS to 2081/82 BS.  The study has been based on the secondary data  The study is limited to the use of financial and statistical tools only. 11 CHAPTER II RESULTS AND FINDINGS 2.1 Data Presentation Data presentation is the process of organizing, summarizing, and displaying collected data in a clear, systematic, and meaningful manner so that it becomes easy to understand and interpret. It helps in converting raw data into useful information through the use of tables, charts, graphs, diagrams, and other visual tools. Effective data presentation allows researchers, businesses, and decision-makers to analyze trends, compare values, and draw accurate conclusions, making it an essential part of research and report writing. Non Performing Loan Ratio Non-performing loan ratio measures the proportion of loans that are not generating income relative to total loans.It indicates the quality of a bank’s loan portfolio.A higher ratio reflects higher credit risk and poor loan recovery.This ratio helps assess the financial health and risk exposure of a bank. Table 1: Non Performing Loan Ratio Non Performing Loan Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Non Performing Assets Total Loan and Advance NPL Ratio 2077/78 3423 239019 1.43 2078/79 3478 268839 1.29 2079/80 11788 368127 3.2 2080/81 16309 383189 4.26 2081/82 21411 425902 5.03 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 1 shows the Non Performing Loan Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The NPL Ratio was 1.43 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 1.29 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 3.2 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 4.26 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 5.03 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest NPL Ratio was 5.03 percent in 2081/82 B.S., while the lowest was 1.29 percent in 2078/79 B.S. The average NPL Ratio over the 12 period was 3.042 percent. The trend indicates an initial decrease followed by a significant and consistent increase in the later fiscal years. Figure 1: Trend Line of Non Performing Loan Ratio Trend Line of Non Performing Loan Ratio Figure 1 shows the Non Performing Loan Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME). Over the observed period, the bank's non-performing loan situation initially showed a slight improvement before undergoing a substantial and continuous deterioration. There was a brief period where the proportion of problematic loans was at its lowest, indicating a relatively healthy asset quality. However, in subsequent periods, there was a noticeable and steady rise in the prevalence of non-performing loans, reaching its highest point towards the end of the study. This overall pattern suggests a growing challenge in managing credit risk, with a clear upward trajectory in the volume of distressed assets. Capital Adequacy Ratio Capital adequacy ratio (CAR) measures a bank’s ability to absorb losses using its capital in relation to risk-weighted assets.It indicates the financial strength and stability of a bank in managing credit and operational risks.A higher CAR shows that the bank is wellcapitalized and less likely to face insolvency.This ratio is regulated by central banks to ensure the safety of depositors and the banking system. 1.43 1.29 3.2 4.26 5.03 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year NPL Ratio NPL Ratio 13 Table 2: Capital Adequacy Ratio Capital Adequacy Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Total Capital Fund Total Risk Weighted Exposure CAR in Percent 2077/78 36803 278718 13.2 2078/79 41423 326988 12.67 2079/80 61368 460066 13.34 2080/81 58606 473091 12.39 2081/82 66530 525860 12.65 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 2 shows the Capital Adequacy Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The CAR in Percent was 13.2 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 12.67 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 13.34 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 12.39 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 12.65 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest CAR was 13.34 percent in 2079/80 B.S., and the lowest was 12.39 percent in 2080/81 B.S. The average CAR over the period was 12.85 percent. The trend indicates a fluctuating but generally stable capital position within a narrow range. 14 Figure 2: Trend Line of Capital Adequacy Ratio Trend Line of Capital Adequacy Ratio Figure 2 shows the Capital Adequacy Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME). Throughout the study period, the bank's capital adequacy demonstrated a generally consistent level, with minor variations. There were instances where the ratio reached its peak, indicating a robust capital buffer, and other times when it dipped to its lowest point, though still remaining within a relatively stable band. The overall pattern suggests that the bank maintained a resilient capital base, capable of absorbing potential risks, without experiencing dramatic shifts. This indicates a steady approach to managing its financial strength relative to its risk-weighted exposures. Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio Loan and advance to deposit ratio measures the proportion of total loans and advances compared to total deposits.It indicates how much of the bank’s deposits are used for lending activities.A higher ratio shows higher income potential but may increase liquidity risk.This ratio helps assess lending efficiency and liquidity position of a bank. 13.2 12.67 13.34 12.39 12.65 11.80 12.00 12.20 12.40 12.60 12.80 13.00 13.20 13.40 13.60 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year CAR in Percent Ratio in Percent 15 Table 3: Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Loans and Advance Total Deposits Ratio in Percent 2077/78 239019 268434 89.04 2078/79 268839 276965 97.07 2079/80 368127 426325 86.35 2080/81 383189 487456 78.61 2081/82 425902 550629 77.35 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 3 shows the Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The Ratio in Percent was 89.04 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 97.07 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 86.35 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 78.61 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 77.35 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest ratio was 97.07 percent in 2078/79 B.S., while the lowest was 77.35 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ratio over the period was 85.684 percent. The trend shows an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease in the subsequent fiscal years. Figure 3: Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio Figure 3 shows the Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited 89.04 97.07 86.35 78.61 77.35 0.00 20.00 40.00 60.00 80.00 100.00 120.00 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year Ratio in Percent Ratio in Percent 16 (GBIME). The bank's lending activity relative to its deposit base exhibited a distinct pattern over the observed years. Initially, there was an upward movement, indicating a period where a greater proportion of deposits was being channeled into loans, reaching a peak. Following this, a sustained downward trend emerged, suggesting a shift towards a more conservative lending approach or a significant growth in the deposit base relative to loan expansion. This overall trajectory indicates a changing dynamic in how the bank utilized its deposits for credit creation, moving from a more aggressive stance to a more reserved one. Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio Loan and advance to total assets ratio measures the proportion of total loans and advances to total assets.It indicates how much of the bank’s assets are invested in lending activities.A higher ratio reflects greater focus on income-generating loans.This ratio helps assess asset utilization and lending efficiency. Table 4: Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Loan and Advance Total Assets Ratio in Percent 2077/78 239019 346142 69.05 2078/79 268839 360538 74.57 2079/80 368127 526883 69.87 2080/81 383189 604519 63.39 2081/82 425902 688081 61.9 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 4 shows the Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The Ratio in Percent was 69.05 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 74.57 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 69.87 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 63.39 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 61.9 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest ratio was 74.57 percent in 2078/79 B.S., and the lowest was 61.9 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ratio over the period was 67.756 percent. The trend indicates an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease in the subsequent fiscal years. 17 Figure 4: Trend Line of Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio Trend Line of Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio Figure 4 shows the Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME). The proportion of the bank's assets allocated to loans and advances displayed a noticeable shift across the study period. Initially, there was an expansion in this allocation, reaching its highest point, suggesting a period of increased focus on lending activities relative to other asset classes. Subsequently, this trend reversed, leading to a continuous decline in the ratio. This indicates a strategic adjustment where a smaller portion of the bank's overall assets was directed towards loans, possibly reflecting a diversification of assets or a more cautious lending environment. Return on Assets Ratio Return on assets ratio (ROA) measures how efficiently a firm uses its total assets to generate profit.It is calculated by dividing net profit by total assets.A higher ROA indicates better asset utilization and profitability.This ratio helps assess overall operational efficiency of a business. 69.05 74.57 69.87 63.39 61.9 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year Ratio in Percent Loan and Advance to Total Assets 18 Table 5: Return on Assets Ratio Return on Assets Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Net Profit Total Assets ROA in Percent 2077/78 4166 346142 1.2 2078/79 4960 360538 1.38 2079/80 6695 526883 1.27 2080/81 6138 604519 1.02 2081/82 5077 688081 0.74 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 5 shows the Return on Assets Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The ROA in Percent was 1.2 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 1.38 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 1.27 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 1.02 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 0.74 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest ROA was 1.38 percent in 2078/79 B.S., and the lowest was 0.74 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ROA over the period was 1.122 percent. The trend shows an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease in the subsequent fiscal years. Figure 5: Trend Line of Return on Assets Trend Line of Return on Assets Figure 5 shows the Return on Assets Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME). The 1.2 1.38 1.27 1.02 0.74 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year ROA in Percent Ratio in Percent 19 bank's efficiency in generating profit from its total assets exhibited a fluctuating but ultimately declining pattern. There was an initial period of improved performance, where the return reached its highest level, indicating strong asset utilization. However, this was followed by a sustained downward trajectory, suggesting a diminishing ability to convert assets into net income. This overall trend points to increasing challenges in profitability relative to the bank's expanding asset base, reflecting potential pressures on operational efficiency or revenue generation. Return on Equity Ratio Return on equity ratio (ROE) measures the profit earned on shareholders’ equity.It is calculated by dividing net profit by total equity.A higher ROE indicates better returns to investors.This ratio helps assess the firm’s profitability and financial performance. Table 6: Return on Equity Ratio Return on Equity Ratio Rs.(In Millions) Fiscal Year Net Profit Shareholders Equity ROE in Percent 2077/78 4166 33439 12.46 2078/79 4960 37740 13.14 2079/80 6695 59054 11.34 2080/81 6138 61408 9.99 2081/82 5077 66628 7.62 Note: Annual Report of GBIME Table 6 shows the Return on Equity Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. The ROE in Percent was 12.46 percent in 2077/78 B.S., 13.14 percent in 2078/79 B.S., 11.34 percent in 2079/80 B.S., 9.99 percent in 2080/81 B.S., and 7.62 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The highest ROE was 13.14 percent in 2078/79 B.S., and the lowest was 7.62 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ROE over the period was 10.91 percent. The trend shows an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease in the subsequent fiscal years. 20 Figure 6: Trend Line of Return on Equity Trend Line of Return on Equity Figure 6 shows the Return on Equity Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME). The profitability for the bank's shareholders demonstrated a clear pattern over the study period. Initially, there was an upward movement, indicating an enhanced ability to generate earnings for equity holders, reaching its peak. However, this positive momentum was followed by a consistent and significant decline, suggesting a weakening in the bank's capacity to deliver returns on shareholder investments. This overall trajectory highlights a period of decreasing efficiency in leveraging equity to produce net income, potentially impacting investor confidence over time. 2.2 Analysis of Results An analysis of the dependent variable, Non Performing Loan (NPL) ratio, reveals a concerning trend. While the NPL ratio initially showed a slight improvement, it subsequently experienced a significant and continuous increase, indicating a deteriorating asset quality. This upward trajectory in problematic loans suggests growing challenges in credit risk management. Concurrently, the independent variable, Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), demonstrated a generally stable yet fluctuating pattern, maintaining a resilient capital base despite the rising NPLs. This suggests that while the bank's capital buffer 12.46 13.14 11.34 9.99 7.62 0.00 2.00 4.00 6.00 8.00 10.00 12.00 14.00 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Fiscal Year ROE in Percent Ratio in Percent 21 remained adequate, the increasing credit risk could potentially put pressure on this stability in the long run. Further analysis of the independent variable, Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio, showed an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease, indicating a shift towards a more conservative lending approach or robust deposit growth. Similarly, the Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio mirrored this pattern, suggesting a strategic adjustment where a smaller portion of the bank's overall assets was directed towards loans. These trends in lending activity, when viewed alongside the increasing NPLs, imply that while the bank might be becoming more cautious in its lending, the quality of its existing loan portfolio has been declining. Furthermore, the Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE) ratios both exhibited an initial increase followed by a consistent decrease, highlighting a diminishing ability to generate profits from both assets and shareholder investments, which could be partly attributed to the rising non-performing loans and potentially more conservative lending practices. 2.3 Finding The findings of this study provide a comprehensive overview of Global IME Bank Limited's credit management performance across key financial indicators over a five-year period. The analysis reveals distinct trends in asset quality, capital strength, lending practices, and profitability, highlighting areas of both stability and concern. Specifically, the bank has experienced a notable increase in non-performing loans, while its capital adequacy has remained relatively stable. Lending ratios have shown a shift towards conservatism, and overall profitability metrics have demonstrated a declining trend in recent years.  The Non Performing Loan Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) from 2077/78 B.S. to 2081/82 B.S. initially decreased from 1.43 percent to 1.29 percent, but then significantly increased to 3.2 percent, 4.26 percent, and 5.03 percent in subsequent years. The highest NPL Ratio recorded was 5.03 percent in 2081/82 B.S., and the lowest was 1.29 percent in 2078/79 B.S. The average NPL Ratio for the period stood at 3.042 percent, indicating an overall upward trend in problematic loans after an initial dip. 22  Global IME Bank Limited's Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) fluctuated between 13.2 percent in 2077/78 B.S. and 12.65 percent in 2081/82 B.S., with a peak of 13.34 percent in 2079/80 B.S. and a low of 12.39 percent in 2080/81 B.S. The average CAR over the five fiscal years was 12.85 percent. This suggests that the bank maintained a generally stable capital position, despite minor variations, demonstrating its capacity to absorb potential risks.  The Loan and Advance to Deposit Ratio for Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) showed an initial rise from 89.04 percent in 2077/78 B.S. to its highest point of 97.07 percent in 2078/79 B.S. Subsequently, the ratio consistently declined to 86.35 percent, 78.61 percent, and 77.35 percent by 2081/82 B.S., which was the lowest value. The average ratio for the period was 85.684 percent, indicating a trend of decreasing reliance on deposits for loan funding after an initial surge.  The Loan and Advance to Total Assets Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) experienced an increase from 69.05 percent in 2077/78 B.S. to its highest at 74.57 percent in 2078/79 B.S. Following this, the ratio steadily decreased to 69.87 percent, 63.39 percent, and reached its lowest point of 61.9 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ratio across the study period was 67.756 percent, reflecting a consistent downward trend in the proportion of assets allocated to loans after an initial rise.  Global IME Bank Limited's Return on Assets (ROA) Ratio initially improved from 1.2 percent in 2077/78 B.S. to its highest at 1.38 percent in 2078/79 B.S. However, it then consistently declined to 1.27 percent, 1.02 percent, and reached its lowest value of 0.74 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ROA for the five years was 1.122 percent, indicating a decreasing efficiency in generating profit from its total assets in the later years.  The Return on Equity (ROE) Ratio for Global IME Bank Limited (GBIME) showed an initial increase from 12.46 percent in 2077/78 B.S. to its peak of 13.14 percent in 2078/79 B.S. Subsequently, the ratio consistently decreased to 11.34 percent, 9.99 percent, and reached its lowest point of 7.62 percent in 2081/82 B.S. The average ROE over the period was 10.91 percent, demonstrating a clear downward trend in profitability for shareholders after an initial improvement. 23 CHAPTER III SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION 3.1 Summary The research is done in only one bank among the many Commercial Banks in Nepal, which is listed in Nepal Stock Exchange. In the study of few research project work on same topic of several Commercial Banks in Nepal. The previous researcher used the NEPSE index, but this study finds out conclusion using the Banking Sector Index which is a sub-index. The Banking Sector Index is calculated based on listed Commercial Banks in Nepal. The study provides the foundational context for the study. It begins with the background of the research topic, followed by a detailed profile of the organization under study. The chapter also clearly states the problem being addressed, outlines the research objectives, and explains the rationale behind conducting the study. A review of relevant literature is included to frame the research within existing knowledge, followed by a description of the methodology used. Additionally, the chapter covers the limitations encountered during the study and presents the overall structure of the research report. The profile of Global IME Bank Limited is briefly presented, followed by the identification of the core research problem: evaluating the bank’s efficiency in credit management performance over the five fiscal years from 2077/78 BS to 2081/82 BS. The study seeks to understand the trends and relationships concerning Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio, and Loans to Deposit Ratio. The objectives include analyzing the Non Performing Loan of the sample bank, as well as its Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loans to Deposit Ratio. In the part of findings focuses on presenting and analyzing the collected data, It starts with the systematic presentation of data relevant to the study, followed by a thorough analysis of the results. The chapter concludes with a summary of key findings derived from the data analysis, highlighting significant trends and insights related to the research objectives. Overall Summary and Conclusion wraps up the study by summarizing the main points and outcomes. It provides a concise overview of the entire research process and discusses 24 the conclusions drawn based on the findings. The report is completed with a bibliography listing all references used throughout the study and appendices that include supplementary materials supporting the research. 3.2 Conclusion In conclusion, the independent variables, namely Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR) and Loans to Deposit Ratio (LDR), played a crucial role in shaping the credit management performance of Global IME Bank Limited during the study period from 2077/78 BS to 2081/82 BS. Changes in these ratios directly influenced the bank's ability to manage its credit portfolio effectively. For instance, a robust Capital Adequacy Ratio indicates the bank's financial strength and its capacity to absorb potential losses from credit defaults. Similarly, the Loans to Deposit Ratio reflects the bank's liquidity management and its aggressive or conservative lending practices. Trends observed in these variables over the five fiscal years provided key insights into the bank's operational strategies and risk appetite in lending. The dependent variable, Non Performing Loan (NPL), was significantly affected by the movements in Capital Adequacy Ratio and Loans to Deposit Ratio. An increase in NPL often suggests challenges in the bank's credit quality, potentially linked to aggressive lending indicated by a high LDR, or insufficient capital buffers if CAR is declining. Conversely, a stable or decreasing NPL, especially when supported by adequate CAR and a balanced LDR, points to sound credit policies and effective risk mitigation. The analysis of NPL trends in Global IME Bank Limited over the five-year period thus provided a clear picture of its asset quality and the effectiveness of its credit management strategies, directly reflecting the impact of its capital structure and lending intensity. Overall, this study successfully achieved its objectives by analyzing the Non Performing Loan, Capital Adequacy Ratio, and Loans to Deposit Ratio of Global IME Bank Limited. The findings offer valuable insights into the bank's credit health and its adherence to regulatory standards. Practically, it provides Global IME Bank Limited with a performance overview, which can be useful for refining its credit policies, risk management frameworks, and strategic planning to ensure sustainable growth and financial stability. 25 BIBLIOGRAPHY Acharya, P. (2017). Regulatory framework and commercial banking in Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Management , 5 (1), 35-50. Acharya, P. (2020). Capital Adequacy and Lending Practices in Developing Economies. Asian Economic Review , 22 (1), 45-60. Adhikari, K. (2023). Sustainable Lending Practices and Credit Performance at NMB Bank Limited. Journal of Sustainable Finance and Banking , 6 (4), 110-125. Chen, L. (2022). The Influence of Macroeconomic Factors on Bank Credit Risk in Emerging Economies. Journal of Global Finance and Development , 18 (1), 25- 40. Gurung, D. (2018). Managing Non-Performing Loans: A Case Study of Standard Chartered Bank Limited. Journal of Banking and Financial Management , 10 (4), 201-215. Gurung, P. (2020). Capital Adequacy and Financial Stability of Nepalese Banks. Nepalese Economic Review , 8 (1), 45-58. Johnson, R. (2019). The global significance of credit management in commercial banking. Journal of Financial Economics , 45 (2), 112-128. Karki, S. (2016). Impact of Credit Risk Assessment on Profitability of Everest Bank Limited. Nepalese Journal of Finance and Economics , 8 (1), 78-93. Karki, S. (2020). Lending Practices and Loan Quality in Nepalese Commercial Banks. Nepal Rastra Bank Economic Review , 22 (1), 45-60. Khanal, S. (2019). Non-Performing Loans and Bank Profitability in Nepal. Journal of Banking and Finance , 15 (2), 112-125. Koirala, S. (2017). Modern Credit Management: Principles and Practices . Himalayan Publishers. 26 Limbu, B. (2020). Customer Relationship Management in Credit Services at Citizens Bank International Limited. Journal of Financial Services Research Nepal , 7 (1), 65-80. Miller, J. (2023). Behavioral Aspects of Loan Repayment and Credit Scoring Models. Journal of Applied Behavioral Finance , 11 (2), 70-85. Miller, L. (2020). Technological advancements in credit risk assessment. International Journal of Banking and Finance , 12 (3), 201-215. Rai, A. (2019). The Role of Credit Policy in Mitigating Risk at Prime Commercial Bank Limited. Nepalese Business Review , 15 (2), 30-44. Rai, M. (2017). Agency Problems in Banking and Credit Risk. International Journal of Financial Studies , 4 (1), 60-75. Rai, S. (2022). Enhancing credit management practices in Nepalese commercial banks. Himalayan Journal of Finance and Banking , 7 (1), 15-30. Sharma, R. (2015). An Analysis of Credit Portfolio Management at Nepal Bank Limited. Journal of Nepalese Banking Studies , 5 (2), 45-60. Sharma, R. (2018). Capital Adequacy and Non-Performing Loans in South Asian Banks. Journal of Financial Economics and Policy , 10 (2), 112-128. Sharma, R. (2018). Credit Risk Management in Commercial Banks . Himalayan Publishing House. Sharma, R. (2018). Understanding Non Performing Loans in South Asian Banking. Journal of Financial Studies , 15 (3), 112-125. Shrestha, K. (2021). Non-performing loans and credit management in Nepali commercial banks. Journal of Business and Economics Research , 10 (2), 88-105. Shrestha, N. (2022). Credit Risk Mitigation Techniques Adopted by Kumari Bank Limited. Journal of Banking and Finance Nepal , 9 (3), 150-165. Smith, J. (2018). Credit Risk Management in Banking . Financial Press. 27 Subedi, G. (2024). Technological Innovations in Credit Delivery at Himalayan Bank Limited. Nepalese Journal of Technology and Banking , 4 (1), 55-70. Thapa, A. (2017). Credit Risk Management in Emerging Markets . Himalayan Publishers. Thapa, D. (2021). Determinants of Loan Quality in Nepalese Commercial Banks. Nepal Journal of Management , 8 (2), 88-102. Thapa, D. (2021). Liquidity Management and Bank Performance in Nepal. Asian Journal of Finance and Economics , 7 (3), 201-215. Thapa, P. (2017). Credit Sanctioning Process and its Effectiveness at Global IME Bank Limited. Asian Journal of Commercial Banking , 12 (3), 112-128. Yadav, M. (2021). Digitalization of Credit Processes at Siddhartha Bank Limited and its Efficiency. International Journal of Digital Banking , 3 (2), 88-102. 28 APPENDICES Rs.(In Millions) Item 2077/78 2078/79 2079/80 2080/81 2081/82 Non Performing Assets 3423 3478 11788 16309 21411 Total Loan and Advance 239019 268839 368127 383189 425902 NPL Ratio 1.43 1.29 3.2 4.26 5.03 Total Capital Fund 36803 41423 61368 58606 66530 Total Risk Weighted Exposure 278718 326988 460066 473091 525860 CAR in Percent 13.2 12.67 13.34 12.39 12.65 Loans and Advance 239019 268839 368127 383189 425902 Total Deposits 268434 276965 426325 487456 550629 Ratio in Percent 89.04 97.07 86.35 78.61 77.35 Loan and Advance 239019 268839 368127 383189 425902 Total Assets 346142 360538 526883 604519 688081 Ratio in Percent 69.05 74.57 69.87 63.39 61.9 Net Profit 4166 4960 6695 6138 5077 Total Assets 346142 360538 526883 604519 688081 ROA in Percent 1.2 1.38 1.27 1.02 0.74 Net Profit 4166 4960 6695 6138 5077 Shareholders Equity 33439 37740 59054 61408 66628 ROE in Percent 12.46 13.14 11.34 9.99 7.62

Credit Management Performance in Global IME Bank – Community Presentation | Presenton