Loading...
Community presentation
Create a 6-slide presentation titled "Ratan Tata: Emotional Intelligence Gaps in Leadership (A Case Study)". AUDIENCE: B.Tech college class, 6 presenters (1 slide each). STYLE: …
Create your own version
Use this visual direction as inspiration for a new Presenton deck.
Use this designCreator prompt
Create a 6-slide presentation titled "Ratan Tata: Emotional Intelligence Gaps in Leadership (A Case Study)". AUDIENCE: B.Tech college class, 6 presenters (1 slide each). STYLE: Clean and professional. Dark navy background with gold accent, white text. Modern sans-serif font (Poppins or Montserrat). Max 4-5 short bullets per slide, no walls of text. Large high-quality images on every slide. Consistent icons. SPEAKER NOTES: Add about 40 seconds of speaker notes for each slide, ending with a one-line handoff to the next presenter. IMAGES: Use high-quality royalty-free images (Unsplash, Pexels, Wikimedia Commons) on every slide, as described below. No cartoonish clipart. Add a small image credit at the bottom if required. --- SLIDE 1: Introduction and Thesis Title: "Ratan Tata: A Visionary Leader, but an Emotionally Intelligent One?" Bullets: - Chairman of Tata Sons (1991-2012, interim 2016-17); grew the group from about $5B to $100B+ in revenue - Analysed using Goleman's 4 EI domains: Self-Awareness, Self-Management, Social Awareness, Relationship Management - Thesis: great vision and ethics, but EI blind spots in ego, emotional decisions, stakeholder reading and conflict handling - 4 episodes we will examine: Nano, Corus/JLR, Mistry ouster, Radia tapes Images: portrait of Ratan Tata (Wikimedia Commons), Bombay House / Tata group building, plus a 2x2 diagram of Goleman's four EI domains. --- SLIDE 2: Self-Awareness Subtitle: "Knowing your own emotions, biases and limits" Bullets: - Tata Nano (2008): emotionally tied to his vision of a "family on a scooter" - Ignored warnings about the "cheap car" stigma and safety/fire incidents; the product failed commercially - Corus acquisition (2007): about $12B paid at a peak valuation, partly driven by global-ambition pride; became a long-term financial drag - Takeaway: strong self-belief, weak recognition of his own ego and bias in big bets Images: Tata Nano car photo, family on a scooter on an Indian road, Corus steel plant. --- SLIDE 3: Self-Management Subtitle: "Controlling impulses, staying composed, adapting" Bullets: - Ford/JLR: humiliated at the 1999 Ford meeting in Detroit; bought Jaguar Land Rover in 2008 for about $2.3B (arguably grudge-driven, though it succeeded) - Singur (2008): withdrew the Nano plant under political protests and moved to Sanand, a reactive response - Mistry removal (2016): abrupt decision that turned into a public boardroom war - Takeaway: composed in public, but emotionally reactive in major decisions Images: Jaguar Land Rover cars or logo, Singur protest / factory site, Sanand plant. Add a simple flow graphic: Trigger → Reaction → Outcome. --- SLIDE 4: Social Awareness Subtitle: "Empathy and reading people, politics and organisations" Bullets: - Misread Cyrus Mistry's restructuring plans (selling loss-making assets) as disloyalty instead of understanding the pressure on the group - Nano marketing: misjudged how aspirational Indian buyers see a "cheapest car" label - Radia tapes (2010): leaks exposed deep lobbying and political networks; the response focused on privacy rather than the core concerns - Takeaway: high personal empathy, weaker reading of the organisational and political environment Images: stakeholder map graphic (Tata Sons, board, employees, government, customers), Nira Radia tapes news visual, Indian car buyers. --- SLIDE 5: Relationship Management Subtitle: "Influence, conflict handling, succession and transitions" Bullets: - Oct 2016: Mistry removed at very short notice; letters leaked and the dispute went public - Legal back-and-forth: NCLAT reinstated Mistry (2019), Supreme Court reversed it (2021) - Succession: no clear heir for years, then returned as interim chairman, which shook trust in the process - Partner disputes (e.g. Tata Docomo) went to arbitration instead of early relationship repair - Takeaway: weakest domain, damaged trust and brand Images: Cyrus Mistry and Ratan Tata photos, courtroom / Supreme Court of India, and a timeline graphic of the Mistry saga (2016 → 2019 → 2021). --- SLIDE 6: Verdict and Lessons Title: "Exceptional Leader, Selective EI Gaps" Scorecard table: - Self-Awareness: Moderate - Self-Management: Moderate - Social Awareness: Strong personally, weaker strategically - Relationship Management: Weakest Fair counterpoints: - 26/11 Taj attack: supported employees' families and victims - Tata Trusts philanthropy, humble persona, ethics-first business Lessons: - EI is more than kindness: check your ego, plan succession, handle conflict well Conclusion: selective EI gaps, not a complete lack of EI Images: Taj Mahal Palace Hotel Mumbai, Tata Trusts / philanthropy photo, scorecard or rating graphic. End with a "Thank you / Questions?" line.
Presentation overview
This community presentation was shared by Omkar Patil as a complete 6-slide example. Create a 6-slide presentation titled "Ratan Tata: Emotional Intelligence Gaps in Leadership (A Case Study)". AUDIENCE: B.Tech college class, 6 presenters (1 slide each). STYLE: … The preview lets you review the full sequence in order, rather than judging the design from a single cover image.
Use it as a reference for planning your own deck: notice how the amount of information changes from slide to slide, where visual emphasis appears, and how repeated design choices help the presentation feel connected. Community examples are inspiration, not locked templates, so you can keep the ideas that fit your audience and replace anything that does not.
Learn from the example
Look at the job each slide performs. Identify where the deck introduces its subject, develops the main points, adds evidence or examples, and moves toward a conclusion.
Notice which element attracts attention first and how headings, supporting text, images, and data are separated. Strong hierarchy makes the intended reading order obvious.
Compare spacing, typography, color, and repeated components across the slides. Consistent rules help varied content feel like one presentation instead of unrelated screens.
Make it your own
Begin with your audience and the decision, lesson, or action the presentation should support. Replace the topic, examples, evidence, and visuals with material you can verify, then edit every slide for one clear takeaway. You can borrow the visual direction without copying the creator's wording or message. Presenton will use this community deck as a design reference while you develop content for your own purpose.
